The short answer is that the Court can declare a document to be a valid will if the document appears to be a will but does not comply with the formal signing and witnessing requirements of the Wills Act 2007. The Court can do that if it is satisfied that the document expresses the deceased’s testamentary intentions.
This means that the document needs to say how a person wants their property to be distributed when he or she dies. The document doesn’t have to be a document that was intended to be the will-maker’s last will. The focus is on the substance of the document (whether it expresses the will-maker’s intentions about what should happen to his or her property when he or she dies) rather than on its form (whether it was intended to be the will-maker’s will).
So long as there is some form of document containing writing (as opposed to oral statements) the Court can declare that a document is a valid will provided the document “appears to be a will.” A document can meet the requirement of appearing to be a will if it is a document made by a natural person (not necessarily the will-maker her or himself) which disposes of the property of the will-maker when she or he dies.
The Court has a broad power to treat a wide range of written material as falling within the definition of “document” including:
The Court will be interested in what the document itself says. The Court will also be interested in:
The procedure is relatively straightforward involving an application to the Court supported by written sworn evidence explaining the relevant circumstances.
The application must be served on close relatives and other people who may be adversely affected if the document is validated as a will. This would include people or organisations who stood to benefit under any previous will.